Best of Costa Rica
In March and April 2026, I spent three weeks in Costa Rica on a solo trip dedicated to bird photography. I travelled around 1,500 km in a 4×4, visiting 21 birding locations. My route took me from San José and Vara Blanca through the Sarapiquí River region, the Caribbean-slope rainforest and northern lowlands, onward to Arenal and the Central Pacific, and finally into the cloud forest of the Talamanca Highlands.
At every location, I hired experienced local guides who could point out the area’s unusual and remarkable birds. Over the three weeks, I took 70,000 images. This album brings together around 30 of the very best. I hope you enjoy them and that they pique your interest in exploring the 13 individual albums that follow.
Across the collection are Resplendent Quetzals, hummingbirds, toucans, tanagers, vultures, owls, macaws and many other birds, alongside photographs of frogs, bats, insects and waterfalls. Each album offers a closer look at a different part of this varied, beautiful and memorable country.
In particular, don’t miss the final album: the Resplendent Quetzals at Paraíso Lodge in the Talamanca Highlands. That was the most extraordinary bird photography experience of my life and, without a shadow of a doubt, the most incredible photographs I have taken of a flying bird.
Full details of the trip—including where I stayed, the birding centres I visited, transportation, food tips and other useful information—are in my Costa Rica trip report.
A note on camera and lenses
I thought long and hard about what camera equipment to take and settled on the Olympus OM-1 Mark II and the OM 50–200mm f/2.8, with the MC-14 1.4× and MC-20 2× teleconverters. Every bird photograph in this album and the 13 albums that follow was taken with the 50–200mm.
Many photographers, particularly bird photographers, question the use of a 2× teleconverter for serious work, especially on a zoom lens. Before the trip, I extensively tested the 50–200mm f/2.8 with and without the converters in February 2026, and wrote about it in this post. The tests showed that the lens produced excellent image quality, even with a 2× converter. But test results are one thing; a once-in-a-lifetime bird photography trip is another, so I reviewed the 70,000 images with some trepidation when I returned.
I’ve been extremely happy with the results, particularly given how lightweight and usable this lens is. The bird images show every element of the feather detail and capture and enhance all the colours and Iridescence of their plumage. Across the 245 bird images in these albums, the EXIF data show that about 45% were taken with the MC-14, 43% with the MC-20, and 6% with the 50–200mm alone.
In this album, the numbers are: 2 without a teleconverter, 16 with the MC-14 (1.4×), and 12 with the MC-20 (2×). I’d be interested to know whether you can tell which images used the 2× converter and which used no converter (the answer can be found by clicking the “i” button in the top right corner of the image page).
This trip confirmed the 50–200mm as my go-to wildlife lens for the foreseeable future. I hope the albums might also help other photographers considering a high-quality, lightweight super-zoom setup.
To view an image at full size, select it to open the viewer, then use the arrows to move through the album. Open the information panel to read the image title and description.
