Depth of field for birds in flight – good or bad?

ByDMcA
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fs.studiobinder.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F08%2FWhat-is-Depth-of-Field-Aperture-Graphic.jpg%3Fresolution%3D1680%2C2&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.studiobinder.com%2Fblog%2Fwhat-is-depth-of-field-definition%2F&tbnid=uXxk1PTOEw07aM&vet=12ahUKEwj84vKPjOTtAhUBEGMBHfPCAUoQMygGegUIARC-AQ..i&docid=inoTq4sQiySY5M&w=1600&h=800&q=Depth%20of%20field%20definition&safe=strict&ved=2ahUKEwj84vKPjOTtAhUBEGMBHfPCAUoQMygGegUIARC-AQ

If you would rather head straight to a concise summary, the TL;DR is at the foot of the page — or jump directly to the FAQ.

Many camera enthusiasts see the wide depth of field (DoF) inherent to Olympus cameras, as a disadvantage. In my humble opinion, wide DoF is a positive advantage for landscape photography, for street, and above all, for birds in flight. Shallow DoF is mostly of use in portraiture, and there is no problem at all in achieving it with the Olympus system, particularly with the wonderful 75mm lens.

TL;DR
  • Olympus has 4× the depth of field of full-frame cameras when matching subject magnification and aperture (same effective f-number).
  • For birds in flight, this is an advantage: wider DoF means AF uncertainty tolerance is higher, missing focus is less critical.
  • Full-frame 2–3 stop shallower DoF requires tighter AF, faster shutter speeds, and more precision for keepers—opposite of what BIF photographers need.
  • If shallow DoF is desired for BIF (e.g., for portraiture of perched raptors), Olympus 75mm f/1.8 delivers f/3.6 effective (shallow for MFT) with 5-stop IBIS.
  • Wide DoF is often mischaracterised as weakness; for action and wildlife it is a structural advantage.

Back to the article.

Frequently asked questions

Why does subject magnification matter for DoF comparison?

DoF scales inversely with aperture and magnification. To compare systems fairly, you must match both. EM1x at 100mm f/2 produces 2× magnification at 50mm DoF. A9 at 200mm f/4 produces the same magnification and DoF. Comparing EM1x to A9 at 300mm f/4 is unfair—the A9 is at 3× magnification and shallower DoF.

Is wide DoF actually good for birds in flight?

Yes. AF uncertainty in continuous tracking = ±0.5–2mm focus error. With EM1x’s wide DoF, ±2mm error is invisible. With A9’s shallow DoF at equivalent magnification, the same error causes slight softness. Wide DoF tolerates AF jitter; shallow DoF amplifies it.

Can Olympus achieve shallow DoF if needed?

Yes. The 75mm f/1.8 lens on EM1x produces f/3.6 effective aperture at 1.5× magnification (shallow for MFT). Not f/1.8 equivalent full-frame shallow, but 1–2 stops shallower than the standard 100mm f/2 and sufficient for selective focus on perched raptors.

Does IBIS interact with DoF?

Indirectly. IBIS allows slower shutter speeds at lower ISOs; lower ISO improves shadow detail and simplifies post-processing. It does not change DoF itself, but enables shooting at smaller apertures (higher ISO penalty is lower).

Full-frame in crop mode: does it narrow DoF?

No. Crop mode removes pixels (e.g., A9 crop to 18MP); magnification is identical, aperture is unchanged, so DoF does not narrow—but signal-to-noise ratio degrades. Avoid full-frame crop mode entirely for BIF.

Back to the article.

Similar Posts

  • EM1x update on firmware 2 bird AF operation and settings

    ByDMcA

    Four custom presets covering stationary birds with Bird AI, takeoffs and landings with ProCapture L, fast head-on subjects with CAF sensitivity -2, and general fast BIF with CAF sensitivity 0 give the EM1x the flexibility to handle every scenario I encounter without entering the menu between shots. The function lever in position 1 with exposure compensation on the rear dial is the most important single setup choice for consistently exposed BIF shots.

  • Olympus OM1 compared to Nikon Z7 for long exposure photography

    ByDMcA

    The Nikon Z7 has no exposure timer, no live feedback during long exposures, and requires 39 dial clicks to switch from a test shutter speed to bulb mode — three failures that make it extraordinarily frustrating for long exposure work. The OM-1 reaches bulb mode in one dial click, shows a live histogram during the exposure, and in my dark-frame noise tests at ISO 200 equalled or outperformed the Z7 at its base ISO of 64 across exposures of 2, 4, and 6 minutes.

  • Sony Zooms vs the 600mm f4 Prime—comparative image quality

    ByDMcA

    Using standardised test data from The-Digital-Picture — the only widely available source with controlled lab comparisons of both the 600mm f4 GMaster and the wildlife zooms — the £12,000 prime shows minimal perceptible image quality advantage over the £1,600 200-600mm or the £2,400 400-800mm at 600mm. Independent numerical resolution data comparing exotic primes to wildlife zooms essentially does not exist, because manufacturers provide early samples to YouTube influencers rather than to test houses that might measure the difference.

  • Noise on Olympus vs Sony cameras for birds in flight

    ByDMcA

    The EM1x’s sensor has 0.5–1 stop higher read noise than the Sony A9, but system-level noise — accounting for lens speed, IBIS, and in-camera processing — is within 0.5 stops at the ISOs relevant to birds-in-flight shooting. The comparison most people make is unfair: they compare the A9 with a fast prime against the EM1x with a matched prime, where the Sony gathers more light per pixel, and then attribute the cleaner result entirely to sensor size.

  • OM5 custom settings explained

    ByDMcA

    The OM-5 has only one ‘hard’ custom setting on the mode dial (C), with three additional ‘soft’ settings (C2–C4) that can be recalled from buttons but are lost as soon as you press the Menu button — a behaviour that initially baffled me. The practical solution is to store landscape/base settings in C so they can always be recalled as a clean baseline, and use C2–C4 for specialist genres with the understanding that pressing Menu exits them.

  • Dynamic Range and low-light noise – Sony vs OM zooms

    ByDMcA

    At true ISO 3200, DxO data shows the Sony full-frame sensor has approximately a 1-stop dynamic range advantage over the OM Micro Four Thirds sensor — but the OM pro zoom lenses are 1.3 to 1.7 stops faster than the Sony wildlife zooms at equivalent focal lengths, which cancels or exceeds that advantage. The Sony 200-600mm suffers a further penalty at 800mm: it must be cropped to reach that focal length, reducing the active sensor area to approximately APS-C size and eliminating both the resolution and full-frame dynamic range advantages simultaneously.