EM1x update on firmware 2 bird AF operation and settings

ByDMcA
EM1x update on firmware 2 bird AF operation and settings

If you would rather head straight to a concise summary, the TL;DR is at the foot of the page — or jump directly to the FAQ.

If you are a happy user of an EM1x for birds in flight, you probably know a lot of the material in this post. But there are also a lot of things which are probably lurking in the back of your mind, or you might not have thought about the set-up strategy to get the best out of the camera system. This is an attempt to fix that by sharing my approach to the EM1x and firmware 2.0 operation when shooting birds in flight.

TL;DR
  • EM1x firmware 2 AF settings: enable Bird-in-Flight AF with Zone select (small zone), C-AF+TR (continuous + tracking), and custom button for AF mode switching.
  • Optimised settings: AF/MF lever to AF, AF Target Mode = Zone (small), C-AF+TR enabled, tracking response = Medium-Fast, focus area = Flexible/Custom.
  • Shutter speed minimum: 1/2500s for takeoff/landing, 1/1600s for level flight at 300mm f/4 and ISO 200–400.
  • Back-button AF on custom button: faster subject acquisition and mode switching compared to half-press shutter.
  • ProCapture enabled: catches pre-shutter bursts for split-second moments; combined with firmware 2 AF = highly competitive with A9 and A6400.

Back to the article.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between C-AF and C-AF+TR?

C-AF: continuous autofocus, but no predictive tracking. C-AF+TR: same, but adds Subject Tracking and Predictive Tracking. For birds, C-AF+TR is essential—the camera anticipates subject motion during shutter lag.

Should I use Zone select or Full AF?

Zone select (small zone) for birds in flight. Full AF area causes focus hunting and lags. Small zone forces priority on the bird; combined with tracking, it outperforms full-area AF.

What’s the optimal focus area for a small zone?

Flexible/Custom AF target mode with a small zone centred in the viewfinder. Allows repositioning the focus point with joystick while maintaining AF lock. More effective than fixed-centre AF for compositional flexibility.

How does back-button AF help?

Assigns AF activation to a custom button (not shutter half-press). Decouples focus from exposure—allows focus lock while recomposing without relocking focus. Faster mode switching and subject acquisition than shutter-button AF.

Is firmware 2 AF competitive with Sony A9 / A6400?

Yes. Firmware 2’s cross-type PDAF is now cross-type full-frame; Subject Tracking rivals Sony’s AF-animal detection. ProCapture adds 35-frame pre-capture—actually ahead of Sony for BIF. The gap has closed entirely.

Back to the article.

Similar Posts

  • OM and Sony wildlife zooms – lens handling

    ByDMcA

    The rotational inertia index for the Sony 400-800mm is 3.2 times higher than for the OM 50-200mm f2.8 without its tripod collar, which translates directly into how hard each lens is to swing when tracking a fast-moving bird. Neither Sony zoom has a focus preset function, and the Sony 400-800mm’s minimum focus distance of 350cm makes close subjects impractical; the OM 50-200mm with MC20 focuses to 78cm and delivers 2:1 FFE macro capability.

  • Dynamic Range on Olympus vs Sony cameras for birds in flight

    ByDMcA

    At base ISO, the A9 has 1–2 stops more dynamic range than the EM1x, but at ISO 3200 where birds-in-flight shooting typically occurs, the difference narrows to around 0.5 stops — negligible for most subjects. The 1.3-stop lens speed advantage of the OM pro telephoto lenses over the Sony 200-600mm effectively eliminates any remaining DR gap in practice when the comparison is made at matched apertures.

  • OM-3  – not just a hipster street camera?

    ByDMcA

    The OM-3’s new CP (Computational Photography) button consolidates every computational feature into a single dial-controlled menu, freeing up four programmable buttons and making the camera more usable than the OM-1’s eight-button setup in practice. Five named custom settings, a separate video mode dial, and a combined body-plus-six-lens kit weighing 1,287g — less than a single Sony 200-600mm zoom — make it, in my view, the best urban and travel camera available.

  • Best lenses for the new OM-3 camera

    ByDMcA

    The OM-3’s small, elegant body pairs best with compact lenses, and no camera system has a better collection of lightweight options than Micro Four Thirds, with over 100 lenses from seven optical companies accumulated over 17 years. A six-lens kit covering every genre from astro to wildlife — the Leica 9mm, Olympus 17mm, Olympus 9-18mm, Olympus 60mm macro, Panasonic 14-140mm, and Panasonic 100-300mm — weighs just 1,287g total, roughly 300g less than the Sony 200-600mm zoom alone.

  • OM1 vs R5, A1 and Z8: which is the best all-round system?

    ByDMcA

    Testing the Canon R5, Sony A1, and Nikon Z8 paired with lightweight telephoto lenses at 600–800mm against the OM-1 and 300mm f4, none of the full-frame alternatives produced better BIF output — all three had worse net noise when the slower lens apertures were factored in, and most lacked pre-capture RAW or live exposure blinkies. The least-worst full-frame option was the Nikon Z7 or Z8 with the 500mm PF f5.6, which reached approximate noise parity with the OM-1 at 750mm in crop mode but still could not match the frame rate or pre-capture capability.